by Iftekhar Sayeed
The demonization of the Soviet Union came to an abrupt stop with the disappearance of the alleged demon. New allegations were immediately raised against the Muslim world, large parts of which had been partners of the west against the former Mephistopheles. Only the Muslim world posed any threat to the west - especially to America - and that, too, for good reasons, as the West knew well.
The Israel-Palestinian conflict had been there for decades, and now that the common enemy had departed, it was time for Muslims to settle old scores. So, it was not surprising that the London-based Economist newspaper devoted an entire survey to "Islam and the West" in August, 1994. "One of the commonest prophecies of the mid-1990s," opined the newspaper, "is that the Muslim world is heading for a fight with other parts of the world." No points for guessing which other parts they might be.
Why did the Economist think that Islam might go to war with the West? Not because of Israel, or the Gulf War, or the treatment meted out to the Algerian Islamists who won elections there - no, not by a long shot; but because Muslims "feel ashamed of the past few centuries" when they were humiliated by the West. That is to say, Muslims have an irrational chip on their shoulder, not any valid grounds for complaint. After all, India and China had also been humiliated, but they weren't griping against western civilization (of course, this line of reasoning undermines the Economist's thesis, but never mind)....LINK 1 of 5 pages
Friday, May 04, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment